Reading 1 | Response | Reading 2 | Gospel |
---|---|---|---|
Dn 7:9-10, 13-14 | Ps 97:1-2, 5-6, 9 | 2 Pt 1:16-19 | Mt 17:1-9 |
Transfiguration: a vision linking past, present, and future
This week the Feast of the Transfiguration readings interrupt Ordinary time’s semi-continuous readings. In Lent the Transfiguration readings foreshadow Jesus’ coming glory at Easter; today’s readings emphasize Jesus’ glory at his second coming (parousia).
First reading (Dn 7:9-10, 13-14)
The first reading is from the book of Daniel, a Jewish apocalyptic writing. Although set in Babylon during the exile (598-539 BC), the Daniel author lived and wrote many centuries later, during the Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV’s persecutions in Judea (167-164 BC). Daniel is an apocalyptic work that reaffirms God’s care for the people and God’s lordship over history.
In today’s pericope, Daniel describes his vision of God’s heavenly court (“thrones were set up”). Using the prophet Ezekiel’s language and images, the author imagines God (“the Ancient of Days”) seated on the throne-chariot (“his throne was flames of fire, with wheels of burning fire”), with “thousands upon thousands” of ministers serving and worshiping God. God “convenes” the court, and God’s reign begins (“the books were opened”). Daniel’s vision continues with the arrival of “one like a son of man coming on heavenly clouds” to the heavenly court. Jewish hearers recognize this figure, who looks like a human (“a son of man”), as Israel’s angelic guardian Michael. Because Jesus refers to himself as the “Son of Man,” Christians interpret this figure as the resurrected and glorified Christ. The son of man appears before God (“the Ancient One”) and receives “dominion, glory, and kingship.” His dominion and kingship are eternal (“everlasting,” “shall not pass away”): at this point, human history and its cycle of empires ends, and God’s reign begins.
The Lectionary editors chose this reading because Daniel’s apocalyptic vision echoes the gospel’s transfiguration language (“brightness,” “clouds,” “Son of Man”).
Second reading (2 Pt 1:16-19)
The second reading is from an unknown Jewish Christian writing in Peter’s name from Rome in the early second century. Although presented as a letter, 2 Peter uses the literary conventions of a farewell discourse. The author warns his readers about the danger false teachers pose to the believing community, and urges believers to continue to grow in the grace and knowledge of Christ. Scripture scholars place this letter’s composition around 125 AD, making 2 Peter Christian scripture’s last written text.
In today’s pericope, the false teachers have attacked the traditional teaching about Jesus’ second coming (with “cleverly devised myths”) and Jesus’ own prophecy of his return (“prophetic message”). The author responds first by reminding his hearers of Peter’s authority as an “eyewitness” to Jesus’ transfiguration (“majesty”), and one present at God’s revelation (“unique declaration”) about Jesus’ divine Sonship. He then recalls Peter’s “prophetic message” to assure his hearers that what he teaches is true (“altogether reliable”). Peter’s authority and testimony is “a lamp shining in a dark place” for his embattled community.
The Lectionary editors chose this reading because it is the only reference to Jesus’ transfiguration outside the gospel accounts.
Gospel (Mt 17:1-9)
In Matthew’s gospel, Jesus reveals his identity to his inner circle. Through symbolic images and language, Jesus’ transfiguration links him to Israel’s history, to the ever-present and eternal now, and to the coming end time.
- Jewish history. Jesus’ transfiguration takes place on a high mountain, which echoes Moses’ encounter with God on Sinai (Ex 19:16-23, Dt 34:29). A cloud overshadows Sinai during the theophany, indicating God’s presence (Ex 19:16). Moses (the lawgiver) and Elijah (a great prophet) appear with the transfigured Jesus to shows that Jesus is the correct interpreter of Torah. When the divine voice instructs the disciples to “listen to him,” God confirms that Jesus is the “prophet like Moses” (Dt 18:15) who will continue to instruct the people.
- The eternal now. As Jesus is transfigured, his present human appearance changes. His face shines and his clothes are white as light, indicating his righteousness (Mt 13:43) and revealing his coming glory (Acts 1:9). The divine voice affirms that Jesus is God’s beloved Son, indicating Jesus shares God’s divinity and eternal presence (Jn 17:21-24). Although Jesus’ transfiguration happens at a particular moment in his earthly life, his glory transcends time. Like the Father and Spirit, Jesus’ glory exists in the eternal now; his transfiguration is just a momentary glimpse into God’s timeless glory.
- Future eschatology. Jesus’ transfiguration is also a vision of his future glory: first, the glory of his enthronement with the Father; second, his return in glory at the end-time or eschaton. Christian scripture borrows Daniel’s apocalyptic language and images to imagine Jesus’ enthronement and return. In his vision, Stephen describes Jesus’ enthronement: “I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at God’s right hand” (Acts 7:56). In his prophecy of the end time, Jesus describes the Son of Man’s return in glory, coming “upon the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Mt 24:30).
Summary and reflection
The Feast of the Transfiguration shows the ascended Christ’s glory in the middle of Jesus’ human, incarnate life. Daniel’s vision give us words and images to understand and think about Jesus’ glory revealed at this transfiguration, conferred at his enthronement, and a preview of his end-time return. The 2 Peter author connects Peter’s eyewitness account of Jesus’ transfiguration with the reliability of his teachings. Matthew presents the human Jesus pulled out of time and revealed as the eternal Son, in conversation with the past (Moses and Elijah), and pointing toward the promised future glory of all believers.
As we think about Jesus transfiguration, we remember both its symbol language and its gospel context. Matthew calls it a “vision,” and the Lectionary editors link it to Daniel’s apocalyptic visions. Matthew places the transfiguration immediately after Peter’s confession and Jesus’ first passion prediction. Are we disturbed by the transfiguration’s apocalyptic associations with the end time? Are we encouraged by our own share in Jesus’ glory? Are we awed by being counted among those invited to “listen to him?”
—Terence Sherlock