Reading 1 | Response | Reading 2 | Gospel |
---|---|---|---|
Am 6:1a, 4-7 | Ps 146:7, 8-9, 9-10 | 1 Tm 6:11-16 | Lk 16:19-31 |
RCL: Tm 6:6-19 |
Discipleship: the dangers of becoming too comfortable
During Ordinary time the Lectionary presents stories and teachings from Jesus’ everyday ministry. This week’s readings focus on how comfort can make us complacent, morally blind, and spiritually deaf.
First reading (Am 6:1a, 4-7)
The first reading is from Amos, the prophet of social justice par excellence, who prophesied in Israel (the northern kingdom) before the fall and exile. Unlike the earlier prophets who spoke their prophecies, Amos prophesied in writing, mostly in poetry. In today’s pericope, God, speaking through Amos, denounces the Israelite leaders’ opulent lives. The prophet condemns the aristocracy’s luxury (“stretched comfortably on couches,” dining on lamb and veal) because their lifestyle exploits the vulnerable (“they are not made ill by the collapse of Joseph,” the patriarch of the northern kingdom). For their actions, God will destroy the northern kingdom (“the first to go into exile”). The Lectionary editors chose this reading because God’s warnings to the complacent sound like the rich man’s life in today’s gospel.
Second reading (1 Tm 6:11-16)
The second reading is the third and final part of the semi-continuous reading from the first letter to Timothy, written by an unknown author in the late first century AD. First Timothy is concerned with the care and feeding of believing communities: appointing leaders, creating good relationships within the ekklesia, and adhering to Paul’s teachings. In today’s pericope, the author recalls Timothy’s commission (the elders’ laying on of hands in 1 Tm 4:14) and restates the charge Timothy received. “Man of God” is the same title Hebrew scripture uses for Moses and the prophets; the title places Timothy in the same tradition. While the author’s exhortation is probably based on an early commissioning liturgy, the list of virtues (“righteousness, devotion, faith, love, patience, gentleness”), the public confession of faith (“noble confession”), and the charge to fidelity and service (“keep the commandment;” that is, “love one another”) apply to every believing community member. The author urges Timothy (and the ekklesia) to remain faithful until Jesus’ return (“the appearance of our Lord”), according to God’s plan (“the proper time”). The closing doxology describes God using both titles from Hebrew scripture (“King of kings, Lord of lords”) and Greek philosophy (“immortality,” “dwells in unapproachable light”). The Lectionary editors chose this reading to conclude Ordinary time’s semi-continuous reading from 1 Timothy.
Gospel (Lk 16:19-31)
Luke’s gospel presents discipleship teachings as Jesus continues on the road to Jerusalem. In today’s pericope, Jesus’ parable attacks his opponents for their rejection of the Torah’s and the Prophets’ teachings.
- Jesus’ opponents. Just before this parable, the Pharisees, who believed in an afterlife, made fun of Jesus and his teaching about riches and almsgiving. Luke makes a point to say the Pharisees “loved money” (Lk 16:14). Jesus’ parable about reversals in the afterlife includes a teaching about how love of money makes the rich indifferent to the Law and the Prophets.
- Parable part 1: reversal of fortunes. Throughout his gospel, Luke includes warnings about unexpected reversals: prophecies (“rise and fall of many;” Lk 2:34), stories (“humbled/exalted,” Lk 14:11), and parables (“Rich fool;” Lk 12:16-21). The first part of Jesus’ parable describes such a reversal: after death, the rich man who “dressed in purple garments” and “dined sumptuously every day” is in torment, while the poor man who was “covered with sores,” and longed for “scraps from the rich man’s table” is now dines with the Jewish patriarch Abraham. Abraham explains that the rich man “received what was good during [his] lifetime, while Lazarus “received what was bad.” The Pharisees would be dismayed that God could exclude a descendant of Abraham, a Jewish rich man, from Abraham’s feast.
- Parable part 2: arguing with Abraham. In the parable’s second part, Jesus provides a moral context for the reversal of fortunes. In life, the rich man was not only extravagantly comfortable, but also hard-hearted. Blinded by his riches, he chose not to see the poor man. His wealth made him deaf to the Torah’s and prophets’ covenant demand that the rich must share with the poor. Abraham’s answer suggests that the rich man and his brothers are nearly hopeless. If hearing scripture doesn’t engender metanoia (change of mind/heart), neither will someone’s return from the dead. As the rich man rejected Torah and the Prophets, the Pharisees rejected and mocked Jesus’ Torah-based almsgiving teaching. As the rich man rejected Lazarus, so the Pharisees rejected the outcasts among God’s people. Jesus tells the Pharisees that, blinded and deafened by “love of money,” God will exclude them from the coming messianic feast.
Summary and reflection
This week’s readings ask us how comfortable we are with being uncomfortable. Amos tells the comfortable and well-fed that, because they ignore the poverty and collapse of their brother Israelites, they will be first to be exiled. The 1 Timothy author tells the believing community to live virtuously, to remain faithful, and to serve others until Jesus returns. Jesus criticizes those who think group membership alone guarantees entry to the kingdom, and warns again about how riches and comfort derail discipleship.
Scripture’s role, to paraphrase Peter Dunne, is “to comfort the afflicted, and to afflict the comfortable.” Discipleship should always leave us feeling uncomfortable about our comfort with the world. How comfortable are we with the inequality and suffering at our own doors? How comfortable are we with living virtuously, remaining faithful, and serving others? How comfortable are we that we are really hearing what God is asking us to do, and that we are really seeing what remains to be done?
—Terence Sherlock